PC | Gamecube | DS | Wii | PlayStation 2 | PlayStation 3 | PSP | Xbox | Xbox 360

News | Reviews | Previews | Features | Classics | Goodies | Anime | Forums



 

One big happy family?

 

Newsletter

 

Be notified of site updates. Sign-up for the Newsletter sent out twice weekly.

Enter E-Mail Address Below:


Subscribe | Unsubscribe

 

Gaming with Friends, Gaming with Strangers

I was watching Adam Sessler and Morgan Webb on TechTV’s X-Play the other day, (For those of you not in the know, X-play is a fairly high profile game review television show.) and their review of the new Xbox Castle Wolfenstein title sparked one of my pet peeve hang-ups about console gaming right now - cooperative play.

At the end of the review, Adam and Morgan decided to do a little sidebar, and fired up the Xbox for a demonstration of a very rare feature – co-op play.  This demonstration was pretty lame, Morgan and Adam pretty much ran around on their separate split screens, with little teamwork; quickly the controllers were dropped and something to the likes of “well there you go, something a little different for you gamers out there” closed the segment.  What really irks me is not that this segment was fairly weak (or that Adam and Morgan are quickly becoming the Sonny and Cher of the gaming community!) but how foreign and strange the concept of co-op gaming seems to be for the newest generation of gamers.

I don’t want to sound like a grizzled old man here, but I remember the days when you needed two players to play a home console system!  When I played Intellivision, back in the day, it was with a group of friends, huddled in my living room (making my mother crazy as well.)  Nowadays, “multi-player” seems synonymous with either networked FPS titles or playing online (FPS or MMORPG).  

Now many satisfy their need for gaming companionship and cooperative play by going online.  Having just taken the online plunge myself, my feelings are mixed.  Playing a game like SOCOM online is far different from even the head to head games (like sports titles) we used to play in the old days.  SOCOM (and many games 

Advertisement

 


on Xbox Live like Mech Assault and Ghost Recon) is fast, brutal, short, and surprisingly impersonal.  The voice chat in SOCOM is a nice touch, but rather than supplying a vehicle for teamwork and cooperation, I find that it is most often employed for emotional outbursts and taunting.  I love taunting as much as the next guy, but how thrilling is it to be told by a 12 year old unrecognizable voice that you are “playing like a goon?”

Advertisement

The world of online games like SOCOM are probably supposed to be more competitive anyway, but what about the other growing online animal, the infamous MMORPG?  Here I can speak from some nascent experience with Everquest Online Adventures.  And I must say this game has unbelievable addictive and communal aspects to it.  It  forces you to team up with other players to have success - you and your companions against the world and its NPC’s.  This seems like the very definition of a co-op game, no?

The problem lies in the fact that when you play a MMORPG on a console (or a PC for that matter) you are restricted to one player, one console, one screen at a time.  So unless you happen to have multiple consoles in your home, you and your buddies can’t really get together and play a MMORPG.  Now you have probably seen the infamous Everquest commercial, where one friend calls the other on the phone and says “It’s time to slay the dragon!”  Not only is that the rankest cheese ever put on television, how often is that situation going to arise in real life?  You and your friends have to stay away from each other to game together?

The bottom line is this, when you play a MMORPG, chances are you are going to be meeting the people you play for the first time online.  And I’m not going to say that is not a gratifying experience, because it is.  Actually, it is rather a new experience that I think should be examined more closely as online gaming continues to grow.  But no matter how much “chatting” you do with your virtual companions, I still maintain you are in essence gaming with strangers.

But to return to the offline experience again, annoying my mother is no longer a problem; and the group of friends that used to game in my living room for the most part has shrunk to a few close friends and my girlfriend.  Still, there are occasions when we like to play together (dare we say, on the same console?) and I continue to scrounge for offline multiplayer options.  The problem is that most games that offer 1-2 or 1-4 player options on the back cover are really misleading you.  Pop that game in and you will see that it is really a single player game with a sparse and bastardized multiplayer option.  For example, two of my favorite and oldest friends came over for a night of Medal of Honor action on the latest Gamecube version of the game, only for us to discover that the multiplayer option was a simple deathmatch on a few deserted maps.  We wanted to kill Nazis together!  Instead we were stuck stalking each other in the skins of the few characters MOH offered.  As much fun as my friend Tosh had playing the Old Lady character and tooling us with the BAR, (worth 5 minutes of yuks to be sure) this experience was shallow and short lived.  Why is it that developers, for the most part, refuse to allow gamers to campaign through the story modes of these games together?

I must say that one of the best experiences I have ever had playing a game cooperatively is playing Baldur’s Gate on the PS2 with my girlfriend.  Here is a game that lets you enjoy the entire story mode of the game cooperatively.   BG is an action RPG and lends itself well to co-op play. We actually finished it; and though a short game, this is still a proud moment for us.  More importantly, it is a single screen coop experience.  Unless you have a gigantic television, the few split screen co-op shooters available (Timesplitters, etc.) make it really hard on the eyes.

I continue to scrounge the shelves for 3rd person single screen coop games, mainly due to the great time we had with Baldur’s Gate.  We have had some fun with the Gamecube version of Hunter the Reckoning (which actually allows up to 4 players co-op) but never stick with it – probably because it lacks the quality of BG.  You can see why I am so excited about the coming releases of Baldur’s Gate 2, FF Crystal Chronicles, and to a lesser degree, Hunter: Wayward, all games featuring single screen co-op action.  I will continue to be on the lookout for upcoming multiplayer offline games (even if it’s a decent split-screen FPS!)

I will also continue to go online in search of teamwork and cooperation.  But I still wish there were more offline co-op options available for consoles these days.  Hopefully, developers will address the gap in this aspect of console multiplay so that we continue to have as many options for playing with friends as we do for playing with strangers.

- Mr. Michael

(June 22, 2003)

Digg this Article!  | del.icio.us

Advertise | Site Map | Staff | RSS Feed

Affiliates:

- BDGamers -   - CnC Den -   - CivFanatics-   - Creative Uncut -   - Darkstation -   - DarkZero -   Devil May Cry   - Dreamstation.cc -   

- Fable 2 -    - GameZone -   - Gaming World X -   - Mario-Kart.net -   - PS2 Fantasy

- PS3 : Playstation Universe -   -TalkXbox -   - Zelda Dungeon -

All articles ©2000 - 2008 The Armchair Empire.

All game and anime imagery is the property of their respective owners.

Privacy Statement - Disclaimer